[ad_1]
Both Samsung and Vivo introduced very compelling flagship smartphones for 2025. The factor is, these two telephones are very completely different. We’re right here to compare them, truly, as we’ll be evaluating the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro. The Galaxy S25 Ultra does have wider availability, which isn’t stunning, however it’ll be attention-grabbing to see the way it stacks up in opposition to the easiest of Vivo.
As we often do, we’ll first listing the specs of each smartphones and can then transfer to different sections. The designs of the 2 telephones will likely be in contrast, as will their shows, efficiency, battery life, cameras, and audio output. There’s loads to speak about right here, so let’s get to it, lets?
Specs
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro, respectively
– Screen measurement:
6.9-inch Dynamic AMOLED 2X (flat, adaptive 120Hz, HDR10+, 2,600 nits max brightness)
6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED show (quad micro-curved, adaptive 120Hz, DHR10+, Dolby Vision, 4,500 nits)
– Display decision:
3120 x 1440
2800 x 1260
– SoC:
Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy
MediaTek Dimensity 9400
– RAM:
12GB (LPDDR5X)
12GB/16GB (LPDDR5X)
– Storage:
256GB/512GB/1TB (UFS 4.0)
256GB/512GB/1TB (UFS 4.0)
– Rear cameras:
200MP (large, f/1.7 aperture, OIS, multi-directional PDAF, 1/1.3-inch sensor, 0.6um pixel measurement), 50MP (ultrawide, 120-degree FoV, f/1.9 aperture, Dual Pixel PDAF 0.7um pixel measurement), 10MP (telephoto, f/2.4 aperture, OIS, 1/3.52-inch sensor measurement, Dual Pixel PDAF, 1.12um pixel measurement, 3x optical zoom), 50MP (periscope telephoto, OIS, 1/2.52-inch sensor measurement, PDAF, 5x optical zoom)
50MP (large, f/1.6, 1/1.28-inch sensor, 1.22um pixel measurement, OIS), 50MP (ultrawide, f/2.0 aperture, 119-degree FoV, 1/2.76-inch sensor measurement, 0.64um pixel measurement), 200MP (periscope telephoto, 1/1.4-inch sensor measurement, f/2.7 aperture lens, 0.56um pixel measurement, 3.7x optical zoom, macro)
– Front cameras:
12MP (large, f/2.2 aperture, Dual Pixel PDAF, 1/3.2-inch sensor measurement, 22mm lens)
32MP (f/2.0 aperture, 20mm lens, ultrawide)
– Battery:
5,000mAh
6,000mAh
– Charging:
45W wired, 15W wi-fi (Qi2 Ready), 4.5W reverse wi-fi (charger not included)
90W wired, 30W wi-fi, reverse wired (charger included)
– Dimensions:
162.8 x 77.6 x 8.2 mm
162.4 x 76 x 8.2 mm or 8.5 mm
– Weight:
218 grams
223/228 grams
– Connectivity:
5G, LTE, NFC, Wi-Fi, USB Type-C, Bluetooth 5.4
– Security:
In-display fingerprint scanner (ultrasonic) & facial scanning
In-display fingerprint scanner (ultrasonic) & facial scanning
– OS:
Android 15 with One UI 7
Android 15 with Funtouch OS 15
– Price:
$1,299+
RM 4,699 ($1,049)
– Buy:
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra (Samsung.com)
N/A
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro: Design
Both of those smartphones are made out of metallic and glass. Samsung’s flagship makes use of titanium and glass, whereas Vivo’s makes use of aluminum and glass. The Galaxy S25 Ultra has sharper corners, and it has a flat body. The body is flat on the Vivo X200 Pro too, whereas each smartphones even have a centered show digicam gap up high. Their bezels are additionally very skinny, and uniform too.
With that being mentioned, the Galaxy S25 Ultra has flat back and front sides, with a flat show. The Vivo X200 Pro makes use of a quad micro-curved design, which suggests its glass on the back and front are each curved on all 4 sides. The show on the cellphone is flat, although. Both smartphones embrace energy/lock and quantity up and down buttons on the suitable aspect. Those are the one bodily buttons on these units.
If we flip them round, you’ll discover vastly completely different digicam setups. The Galaxy S25 Ultra consists of 5 separate protrusions within the top-left nook. Four of these are reserved for its cameras. The Vivo X200 Pro, on the flip aspect, has a big digicam oreo on the again, which is centered within the higher portion of its again. It homes three cameras there, and sure, that digicam oreo does protrude.
The Galaxy S25 Ultra additionally has an S Pen, which is docked within the bottom-left part of the cellphone. Samsung’s cellphone is IP68 licensed, whereas the Vivo X200 Pro comes with IP68 and IP69 certifications. Both smartphones are fairly slippery, whereas they’re additionally very related when it comes to dimensions. The Vivo X200 Pro is barely narrower, however they’re mainly equally tall and thick. Vivo’s cellphone is heavier, although.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro: Display
The Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra includes a 6.9-inch 3120 x 1440 Dynamic LTPO AMOLED 2X show. That panel is flat, and it helps an adaptive refresh fee of as much as 120Hz. HDR10+ content material is supported, and the show goes as much as 2,600 nits of brightness at its peak. The screen-to-body ratio is at round 92%, whereas the show side ratio is nineteen.5:9. Corning’s Gorilla Armor 2 safety is included right here.
The Vivo X200 Pro, on the flip aspect, has a 6.78-inch LTPO AMOLED flat show with a 2800 x 1260 decision. That panel can venture as much as 1 billion colours, and it has an adaptive refresh fee of as much as 120Hz. HDR10+ content material is supported, as is Dolby Vision. The peak brightness right here is 4,500 nits. The screen-to-body ratio is at round 90%, whereas the show side ratio is 20:9. Armor Glass protects this show. That glass is curved on all sides.
Both of those shows are excellent, truly. They’re each vivid, have nice viewing angles, they usually’re greater than sharp sufficient. The blacks are as deep as you’d anticipate them to be, whereas the contact response is nice. The Vivo X200 Pro’s show does get a bit brighter, whereas the Galaxy S25 Ultra’s is excellent in relation to preventing off glare, because of Gorilla Armor 2. You can’t go improper right here.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro: Performance
The Galaxy S25 Ultra is fueled by the Snapdragon 8 Elite for Galaxy processor. That is an overclocked variant of the Snapdragon 8 Elite, Qualcomm’s strongest chip. That is a 3nm processor, in case you had been questioning. Samsung additionally included 12GB of LPDDR5X RAM right here, in most markets, however a 16GB RAM mannequin can be accessible in restricted markets. UFS 4.0 flash storage is used too.
The Vivo X200 Pro, alternatively, makes use of probably the most highly effective chip MediaTek has to supply. It’s the Dimensity 9400 SoC, which can be a 3nm chip. Vivo combines that with 16GB of LPDDR5X RAM within this smartphone, and UFS 4.0 flash storage. The storage is just not expandable on both of those two smartphones. Both of these processors have confirmed to be excellent too, and that interprets to the efficiency right here
Both of those telephones provide excellent efficiency, to say the least. They’re very snappy in mainly each approach, form, and type. You can launch apps rapidly, leap between them and not using a downside, and do mainly every little thing else and not using a hitch. The identical goes for gaming, truly. Both telephones can run even probably the most demanding video games from the Google Play Store. Overheating is just not a difficulty on both cellphone, though each do get fairly heat throughout intense gaming periods, however that’s completely regular.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro: Battery
Samsung opted to make use of a 5,000mAh Li-Ion battery within the Galaxy S25 Ultra. The Vivo X200 Pro, alternatively, makes use of a 6,000mAh silicon-carbon battery. That is sort of a distinction proper there, as Vivo’s cellphone additionally has a barely smaller show. Yes, the Vivo X200 Pro provided higher battery life, in each our battery drain take a look at and utilization, however the distinction was not that large, truly. The Galaxy S25 Ultra managed to carry in there, like a champ.
Both of those telephones will likely be two-day battery telephones for most individuals, in all honesty. Power customers will have the ability to get by way of the day and not using a hitch. Getting over 8-9 hours of screen-on-time is feasible on each units, and we’ve even had some juice left within the tank previous that time. The Vivo X200 Pro managed to cross the 10-hour screen-on-time mark and have some juice left. The battery life is excellent, however do notice that your mileage might differ. It all relies on how you employ your cellphone, your sign, apps which might be in use, and so forth.
When it involves charging, the Galaxy S25 Ultra helps 45W wired, 15W wi-fi (Qi2 Ready), and 4.5W reverse wi-fi charging. The Vivo X200 Pro, alternatively, helps 90W wired, 30W wi-fi, and reverse wired charging. Vivo’s cellphone is the clear winner right here, it should cost quicker each through a wire and wirelessly, whereas it additionally features a charger within the field, in contrast to the Galaxy S25 Ultra.
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs Vivo X200 Pro: Cameras
The Galaxy S25 Ultra options 4 cameras on the again. It has a 200-megapixel essential digicam (1/1.3-inch sensor), a 50-megapixel ultrawide unit (120-degree FoV), a 10-megapixel telephoto digicam (1/3.52-inch sensor, 3x optical zoom), and a 50-megapixel periscope telephoto unit (1/2.52-inch sensor, 5x optical zoom).
The Vivo X200 Pro, alternatively, has three cameras on the again, that are boosted by ZEISS optics and experience. A 50-megapixel essential digicam (1/1.28-inch sensor) is backed by a 50-megapixel ultrawide digicam (1/2.76-inch sensor, 119-degree FoV), and a 200-megapixel periscope telephoto digicam (1/1.4-inch sensor, 3.7x optical zoom).
The Vivo X200 Pro is broadly considered being one of the best digicam smartphone on the market in the intervening time, by many individuals. We’d say that it in all probability is, and if not, it’s positively amongst the highest three. The footage you may get from this cellphone are excellent in mainly any lighting situation. We’ve managed to seize some actually gorgeous photographs throughout our utilization. The Galaxy S25 Ultra does have a compelling digicam setup and efficiency, however it can’t actually compete.
In comparability, the pictures are likely to look oversaturated, and at occasions darker than they need to be. The Vivo X200 Pro does so much higher job with balancing, and it’s extra dependable general. Its periscope telephoto digicam is probably going one of the best in the marketplace in the intervening time, and it does overshadow what the Galaxy S25 Ultra has to supply. Both ultrawide cameras are a minimum of a degree under their essential counterparts, although.
Audio
Both of those telephones include stereo audio system which have good loudness. They’re on par in that regard, and the sound high quality can be on par. There’s even some bass coming from each audio system, they’re greater than ok.
There is not any audio jack on both cellphone, however you’ll be able to all the time use their Type-C charging ports for a similar function. If you favor wi-fi audio, which many individuals do lately, you’ll be glad to listen to that each telephones help Bluetooth 5.4.
[ad_2]
Source link
